appellant/defendant of there not being a liability towards the two bills Ex.PW1/7 and Ex.PW1/12, and the detailed calculations which are proved as Ex.PW1/22, showing an amount due of Rs.3,87,069/-, inasmuch as if the case of the appellant/defendant was that the appellant/defendant had paid all electricity bills i.e. bills for the period of tenancy from the year 1992 to 2000, then what was the difficulty for the appellant/defendant in proving from its own record for the payments made to the DVB for the tenancy period or in summoning records of the DVB to show payments of bills during the tenancy period. In fact, in the cross-examination of the witness of the appellant/defendant namely Sh. Sanjay Deshpandey/ DW-1, and who was the Manager of the appellant/defendant, he admitted in his crossexamination on 16.02.2006 that he did not know if the bill for agricultural power connection was paid by the appellant/defendant. Mr. Sanjay Deshpandey/ DW-1 admitted that they had been receiving the bills from DESU, however it is not deposed by DW-1 that appellant/defendant had made all payments of the electricity bills for the period of the tenancy, and that if bills were paid then what was the documentary proof of payment of the bills be it from the accounts of
