Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Deepak Chaddha Vs Sanjeev Gosain — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2018)

Home
Delhi HC
2018
Deepak Chaddha Vs Sanjeev GosainDeepak Chaddha v. Sanjeev Gosain

Dismissed

Deepak Chaddha v. Sanjeev Gosain

Delhi HC11 May 2018RFA/400/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal dismissed as not pressed. Appellant counsel indicated intent to file an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

$~6

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- RFA 400/2018 and C.M. Nos.19444/2017, 19447/2018 (for condonation of delay), 19445/2018 (stay) & 19446/2018 (exemption)

DEEPAK CHADDHA

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate with Ms. Satvinder Kaur, Advocate.

versus

SANJEEV GOSAIN ..... Respondent

Through

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 11.05.2018

This appeal is disposed of as not pressed as counsel for the

appellant/defendant states that the appellant/defendant proposes to move an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil ProcedureOrder 9 Rule 13 CPC

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Deepak Chaddha
respondent
Sanjeev Gosain

Coram

AI extract

Valmikij Mehta

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 11 May 2018 · May
Registered: 10 May 2018
Case no.: RFA/400/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Valmiki J. Mehta

Sh. Udai Singh & Anr. Vs Smt. Roshni Devi & Ors.
10 May 2018Civil Suit (Original Side)
Dinesh Kumar Vs Mithlesh & Anr.
10 May 2018
Shobha Thapar Vs Oracle Software India Ltd.
9 May 2018
Kamal Jeet Vs Sneh Lata Chaturvedi (Deceased Thr Her Lr)
11 May 2018

Cite this judgement

Deepak Chaddha v. Sanjeev Gosain, RFA/400/2018 (DEL), decided on 11 May 2018.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil ProcedureOrder 9 Rule 13 CPC

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

Valmikij Mehta

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Appeal disposed of as not pressed. The appellant stated intention to move an application for setting aside the decree under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. No substantive decision on merits was recorded.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

MAY 11, 2018 Ne

CNR

DLHC010710172018

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Valmiki J. Mehta

Anjeera Devi Vs Omkar Singh

11 May 2018

Parveen Garg Vs Satpal Singh & Anr.

11 May 2018