Rakesh Gupta v. Madhu Haldar
Case brief
What is this about?
Tenant's appeal dismissed as not pressed. Trial court upheld tenant status via lease deed despite rent exceeding Rent Control Act threshold. Appellant granted sympathy for reasonable vacation time.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as not pressed; executing court directed to consider short reasonable time for vacancy sympathetically.
What the court decided
$~8
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RFA 370/2018 and C.M. Nos.18117/2018(under Order 41 Rules 25 & 27 CPC), 18118/2018 (stay) & 18119/2018(exemption)
RAKESH GUPTA ..... Appellant
Through: Ms. Kirti Parmar, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Parmar, Advocate.
versus
MADHU HALDAR ..... Respondent
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R
% 04.05.2018
- After arguments, and at the stage of dictation of the judgment
for dismissing of this appeal filed by the tenant, counsel for the appellant states that appeal be disposed of as not pressed. Ordered accordingly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is the tenant or his wife was the tenant based on the lease deed
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rakesh Gupta
- respondent
Madhu Haldar
Coram
Valmiki J. Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court