This appeal was disposed of as not pressed. The court observed that the respondent's claim is against a third party, to whom possession was already handed over. All issues regarding title are to be decided in a separate pending suit filed by the appellant.
The appeal was disposed of as not pressed; all issues to be decided in pending Suit No. 614671/2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-69
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SOHAN LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate (Mobile No. 9810928188). versus
DEEPA BALIYAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate (Mobile No. 981123293).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
O R D E R % 01.10.2018
page 1 of 2
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
OCTOBER 01, 2018
AK
page 2 of 2
RFA 286/2006
Sohan Lal
Deepa Baliyan
Valmikij Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
