sum of Rs. 50,000/- out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 11,00,000/-, the issue is whether the respondent/plaintiff has led such evidence to satisfy the judicial conscience of this Court that the respondent/plaintiff, as the proposed purchaser, had the financial capacity to pay the balance sale consideration. In this regard, it is noted that not a single document whatsoever has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff to prove his financial capacity in the form of his bank accounts or income tax returns or property documents etc.. By self-serving averments, the financial capacity cannot be held to be proved. This Court also rejects the argument urged on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff that the respondent/plaintiff had the financial capacity because he owned land of about 5 acres inasmuch as there are no details whatsoever in the trial court record as to where is this so called 5 acres of land, what are the khasra numbers thereof, where is this land located, and more importantly where are the property papers/title documents to show ownership of the respondent/plaintiff of the said 5 acres of land. Also, the existence of immovable property in itself is not enough, in the facts of the present case, to prove financial capacity because an immovable property is not equivalent to
