This order deals with an appeal where the appellant withdrew the initial plea. The court disposed of the appeal as not pressed, granting partial refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court-fees Act, 1870.
Appeal disposed as not pressed; appellant/defendant granted 50% refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SUNNY BHATIA
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Aman Preet Singh, Advocate with Ms. Arpita, Advocate.
versus
VIJAY KUMAR GRIDHAR ..... Respondent
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 11.01.2018
pressed inasmuch as the real remedy of the appellant/defendant is to challenge the order dated 13.12.2017 by which the application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order 9 Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been dismissed.
RFA No.27/2018 page 1 of 2
the initial stage, in view of Section 16-A of the Court-fees Act, 1870 (as applicable to Delhi), appellant/defendant be refunded 50% of the court fee. Registry will issue the necessary certificate in favour of the appellant.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
JANUARY 11, 2018 Ne
RFA No.27/2018
page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunny Bhatia
Vijay Kumar Gridhar
Valmikij Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
