Allowed

Praveen Marwah & Anr. v. Ram Kishore Pathak & Anr.

Delhi HC1 Mar 2018RFA/266/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal and a civil revision application as parties settled disputes through two Memoranda of Understanding. A decree sheet ordered incorporating the settlement terms. Respondents directed to supply documents as per the MOUs.

What did the court decide?

A decree sheet drawn up incorporating the MEMOs; appts to be initially; R-3 & 4 to supply annexure docs and file in Court within one week.

Praveen Marwah & Anr. Vs Ram Kishore Pathak… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~7

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

RFA 266/2007

¶4

PRAVEEN MARWAH & AN	R.	....	. Appellants
Through:	Ms. Mansi K (M:9811446272) Appellant No.1 in Mr. Hitanshu	ukr for per Ma	eja, Advocate Appellant with son. rwah, son of
versus	Appellant No.2 in	per	son.
RAM KISHORE PATHAK &	ANR.	....	. Respondents
Through:	Mr. Shekhar	D	asi, Advocate
	(M:9871655327)	for	R-3 & 4 with
	Mr. B. L. Aggar Bhardwaj, R-3 (M:9811629072)	wal &	and Mr. Manish 4 in person.

¶5

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

¶6

O R D E R % 01.03.2018

¶7

RFA 266/2007 & CM No.31082/2017

¶8

Mr. Parveen Marwah, Appellant No.1 and Mr. Hitanshu Marwah, son of Mr. Rajiv Marwah, Appellant No.2 are present in Court. Mr. B. L. Aggarwal and Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, newly added Respondent Nos.3 & 4 respectively are also present in Court. Respondent Nos.1 & 2 are already ex-parte.

¶9

Parties have settled their disputes. There are two Memoranda of Understanding filed on record. Both are dated 18^th February, 2018. The first Memorandum of Understanding is between Appellant No.1 and the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. The second Memorandum of Understanding is between Appellant No.2 and the Respondent Nos.3 & 4.

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

RFA 266/2007

¶12

The Court has perused the terms of both MOUs/settlement documents. The same are lawful and there is no impediment in accepting the terms of settlements. All the parties shall be bound by the terms & conditions of settlements. The disputes stand settled as per the settlements binding the parties to the terms thereof. Decree sheet be drawn up. Both MOUs/ settlement agreements shall form part of the decree.

¶13

Application and the appeal are disposed of in the above terms. Parties shall initial below in acceptance of the settlements.

¶14

As per clause 2 of the MOUs, the documents mentioned as AnnexureA & Annexure-1 respectively shall be supplied by Respondent Nos.3 & 4 to the Appellants and be filed the same in Court within one week.

¶15

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶16

MARCH 01, 2018/ dk

¶17

Page 2 of 2

¶18

RFA 266/2007

Praveen Marwah & Anr. v. Ram Kishore Pathak & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen Marwah & Anr. v. Ram Kishore Pathak & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Vs Chand Ram & Ors.

Anurodh Singh Pal Vs Himanshu & Anr.

M/S Sky Gourment Catering Pvt. Ltd. Vs Khim Singh

Lancer'S Convent Senior Secondary School Vs Jai Prakash

Rikki Vs Pooja

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs J.C Sharma & Anr.