arguments in the suit. I need not burden this judgment with a catena of judgments of the Supreme Court as also of this Court that readiness and willingness has to be not on one date but continues till the date of final arguments in the suit and some of which have already been referred to by the trial court. No doubt readiness and willingness is not to show liquid moneys available with the plaintiff/proposed purchaser but readiness and willingness has to be that there exists financial capacity. As seen from para 12 of the impugned judgment mysteriously only on two dates of 23.12.2005 and 24.12.2005 there were amounts of Rs.50,25,557/- and Rs.54,25,557/- in the bank account of the appellant/plaintiff but before and after those dates there was barely an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in the account of the appellant/plaintiff. Appellant/plaintiff is also failed to explain why and how the account of the plaintiff mysteriously had the amount of Rs. 50,25,557/- and Rs.54,25,557/- on two dates in December i.e what was the source of those amounts and why such amounts appeared and then disappeared. The appellant/plaintiff has not led any evidence of his financial capacity including of his being owner of any property or properties, and what is the position in the income tax returns, if filed
