Dismissed
Rajyashree Bhartia & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Mehra & Ors.
Delhi HCRFA/104/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
| + RFA 104/2013 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJYASHREE BHARTIA & ORS Through: |
Mr. Amit Ban Manisha Sin No.880028572 |
..... sal, Ad gh, 8). |
Appellants vocate with Advocate |
Ms. (M. |
| versus | ||||
| ASHOK KUMAR MEHRA & ORS |
..... |
Responden |
ts |
|
| Through: | Mr. Nishant |
Datta, | Advocate | for |
| respondent No.981022643 |
4). | No. | 1(M. | |
| Mr. Asheesh |
Jain, | Advocate | for | |
| respondent No.981112510 |
0). | No. | 2(M. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 10.10.2018
C.M. No.42425/2018(under Section 151 CPC by appellants)
the trial court record has actually been received in this Court. In any case,
by the order dated 20.8.2018 appeals were disposed of by passing a preliminary decree and all further proceedings pursuant to the preliminary
RFA No.104/2013 page 1 of 2
decree, if so required, will have to be in the suit before the trial court. If any record is required by any of the parties which forms the record of the suit, then, obviously an appropriate application can be moved by any of the parties in the trial court. Whatever record is available of the suit in these
appeals be sent back to the concerned court.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
OCTOBER 10, 2018 Ne
RFA No.104/2013
page 2 of 2
Rajyashree Bhartia & Ors
Ashok Kumar Mehra & Ors
Valmi Ji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court