Dismissed
Naseem Fatima v. Abdul Hameed
Delhi HCRC.REV./90/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
NASEEM FATIMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.H. Nizami & Mr. M.F. Nizami, Advs.
versus
ABDUL HAMEED ..... Respondent
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 07.03.2018
The counsel for the petitioner submits that this revision petition has been wrongly filed as the proceedings before the Rent Controller in which the impugned order dated 30.10.2017 was passed were not in terms of the special procedure under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 read with Section 25 B. He submits that the appropriate remedy would be by way of an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal. He, thus, requests permission to withdraw the present petition and to be given liberty to approach the Rent Control Tribunal by appeal.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J
MARCH 07, 2018/ nk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naseem Fatima
Abdul Hamed
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court