Petitioners stated tenanted premises were vacated and they withdrew the petition. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn by Justice R.K. Gauba.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
versus
FIROZA BEGUM & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Nayar, Advocate with Mr. I.J. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 18.04.2018
The first petitioner is present in person for himself and for the second petitioner (his mother). His identity is confirmed by taking on record photocopy of his adhar card, which has been attested by him, the original having been seen and returned.
He states on behalf of both the petitioners that the tenanted premises has already been vacated and that the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the petition further.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
APRIL 18, 2018 vk
RAKESH & ANR
FIROZA BEGUM & ORS
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
