Rani Kalra v. Jai Narain
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition for leave to file a revisional appeal in a rent controller proceeding seeking directions for expedition due to respondent's defaults.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
| * | **IN THE HIGH ** | **COURT ** | OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| + | RC.REV. 40/201 | 7 | |
| RANI KALRA | ..... Petitioner | ||
| Through: | Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Advocate with Mr. Lovish Seth & Mr. Shubham Aggarwal, Adv. along with petitioner in person. |
||
| versus | |||
| JAI NARAIN | ..... Respondent | ||
| CORAM: | Through: | Mr. Arvind Choudhary, Advocate with Mohd. Zuhed Qureshi, Adv. along with respondent in person. |
|
| HON'BLE MR. | JUSTICE R O R D E |
.K.GAUBA R |
|
| % | 22.03.201 | 8 |
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits that since case before the rent controller has already reached the stage of evidence, the present petition is not pressed and he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. The only request made is that suitable directions may be given for the case to be expedited, the respondent having committed defaults in crossexamining the witnesses of the petitioner, though opportunity was granted on several dates.
The counsel for the respondent though submitting that he is not aware of the proceedings before the trial court assures and undertakes that the respondent would take suitable steps in future so that no opportunity granted is wasted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rani Kalra
- respondent
Jai Narain
Coram
R.K. Gauba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court