Disposed
Mohd Talib v. Mohd Sirajuddin
Delhi HCRC.REV./353/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
Through: Mr. SH Nizami, Adv.
versus
MOHD SIRAJUDDIN ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the RC.REV. 353/2018 filed assailing the impugned judgment dated 05.02.2018 of the ARC/ACJ/CCJ in RC/ARC No.158/16 submitting to the effect that the said application is not covered by the DRC Act, 1958, as amended and that the appropriate remedy in the form of civil suit would be taken. Thus, the RC.REV. 353/2018 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek redressal in accordance with law.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
JULY 30, 2018 vm
MOHD TALIB
MOHD SIRAJUDDIN
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court