Petitioners sought liberty to withdraw the present petition and file a review application before the Rent Controller based on a division bench ruling. The court granted this.
Liberty to withdraw petition and move an application for review before the Rent Controller.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJENDER SINGH YADAV & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajant Kumar, Advocate
versus
YOGESH JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 15.03.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition and instead be given liberty to move an application for review before the Rent Controller on the basis of the law declared by a division bench of this court in Ashok Kumar Vs. Purshotam Lal Verma, 233 (2016) DLT 761 .
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J
MARCH 15, 2018 yg
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Vs. Purshotam Lal VermaReferred¶8
Ashok Kumar Vs. Purshotam Lal Verma, 233 (2016) DLT 761 · Who else cites this
Rajender Singh Yadav
Yogesh Jain
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
