Disposed
Salaik Chand Gupta v. Veena Gupta
Delhi HCRC.REV./115/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
SALAIK CHAND GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Mittal, Advocate
versus
VEENA GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nagender Yadav, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
% 23.03.2018
It is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner in which the counsel for the respondent, who has appeared on his own, on advance notice, joins that the parties have amicably settled the dispute where-under the respondent has agreed to allow the petitioner to remain in occupation till 20.04.2020, a formal memorandum of understanding having been executed.
The counsel submits that parties would approach the court which passed the eviction order to place on its record the copy of the memorandum of understanding and that this petition is not pressed
The petition and the applications filed therewith stand disposed of as not pressed.
Dasti.
R.K.GAUBA, J
MARCH 23, 2018/ yg
Salaiik Chand Gupta
Veena Gupta
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court