Dismissed
Promila Kumari v. Viresh Kumar
Delhi HCMAT.APP./9/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed in default as the appellant wife failed to appear for hearing and sought adjournment.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8.
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- MAT.APP. 9/2007 PK ..... Appellant Through: None. versus
¶4
- VK ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv. for LR-1.
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
¶7
- O R D E R
¶8
- % 11.07.2018
¶9
- None appears for the appellant.
¶10
- The counsel for the brother of the respondent husband states (i) that this appeal was preferred by the appellant wife against the decree of dissolution of marriage of the appellant wife with the respondent husband; (ii) that the respondent husband died on 31st January, 2013; (iii) that the appellant wife has filed an application being CM No.24522/2017 for substitution of the brothers and sisters of the respondent husband along with an application being CM No.24523/2017 for condonation of delay of 1496 days in filing thereof; and, (iv) that the said applications also are now pending for long and the appellant wife has been dragging her feet.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
PK
- respondent
VK
Coram
AI extract
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court