This order allowed the exemption application but disposed of the main review petition as the applicant failed to make out a case for review regarding calculation of deceased's income.
Exemption application allowed subject to exceptions; review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
BHOM SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate
versus
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Nemo
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 15.03.2019
C.M. 11871/2019 (Exemption)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
C.M. 11872/2019 (delay)
There is delay of 191 days in filing the review petition.
Upon hearing, I find that averments made in the instant application provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned.
The application is disposed of.
REVIEW PET. 109/2019
Learned counsel for revisionist draws the attention of this Court to Paragraph No. 11 of judgment of 27th July, 2018 and submits that the income of deceased has been erroneously taken on the basis of minimum wages and it should have been considered in light of decision in HDFC Egro General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Lalta Devi & Ors. 2015 SCC OnLine Del 6505.
MAC.APP. 81/2018
Page 1
This is an aspect which pertains to the merits of the case. Upon hearing, I find that no case for review of judgment of 27th July, 2018 is made out.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE)
MARCH 15, 2019 v
MAC.APP. 81/2018
Page 2
Bhom Singh and Anr.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd and Anr.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
