This is a default dismissal order because the appellant failed to appear before the Court despite multiple calls, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SHRI JEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Nemo.
Versus
RAMESH CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 19.07.2018
Even on the second call, there is no appearance on behalf of appellant. Same was the position on the last date of hearing. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
This appeal and the application are accordingly dismissed in default.
SUNIL GAUR, J
JULY 19, 2018
r
Shri Jeet Singh
Ramesh Chand & Ors.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
