The High Court of Delhi, at hearing, allowed the appellant to withdraw its appeal dated MAC.APP. 35/2013. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The order merely pronounced the withdrawal without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-717
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate.
versus
MEENA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R % 11.01.2018
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal.
The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
By order dated 11.01.2013, the insurance company was directed to deposit the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch, New Delhi and out of such deposit, 50% was permitted to be released to the claimants. The balance lying in deposit shall also be released to the claimants in terms of the judgment of the Tribunal.
The statutory amount be refunded to the insurance company.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JANUARY 11, 2018 srb
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Meena & Ors.
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
