Disposed
Sukanta Roy Chowdhury v. Agriculture Insurance Co. of India Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi HCLPA/95/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
AGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO OF INDIA LTD & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Madan Gera, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate along with Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2/UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 09.03.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant limits the relief in the present appeal to issue a direction to the respondent to communicate expeditiously to the former the reasons as to why his actuarial folder has been blocked.
Mr. Nandrajog, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1, on instructions, states that the reasons therefore shall be communicated to the appellant on his electronic mail address by the close to business hour by Monday i.e. 12.03.2018.
With the above directions, appeal along with the pending applications is disposed off.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MARCH 09, 2018/ ss
Sukanta Roy Chowdhury
Agriculture Insurance Co of India Ltd
Siddharth Mridul
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court