Rohit Malhotra v. Anand Kuamr Chaurasiya & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi refused to grant an extension of time for deposit of costs following an earlier order. The appellant failed to comply with the deposit requirement or file an extension application by the statutory/ordered deadline. Consequently, the appeal and application were dismissed and the interim order vacated. The court dismissed the plea for more time.
What did the court decide?
The request for extension of time for deposit of costs is rejected; the appeal and application are dismissed, and the interim order is vacated.