The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant without prejudice to its rights and contentions. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without commenting on merits or issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rishi Aggarwal and Mr. Karan Luthra, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COAL ..... Respondent Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. K. M. Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek and Mr. Sahil Sood, Advs. for UOI
CORAM:
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. We have not commented on merits or issues and pleas raised by the parties.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
JULY 24, 2018/b
RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
