Dismissed

Amish Jain & Ors. v. Icici Bank Ltd.

Delhi HC4 May 2018LPA/206/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petitioners before the Delhi High Court argued that the April 4, 2018 order was erroneous and submitted in person. The Court held that a mere showing of erroneous findings is a ground for appeal, not review, rendering the application untenable and dismissing it. Petitioners were allowed to appeal the dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Review petitions dismissed; pending application disposed of; liberty granted to assail order on appeal.

Amish Jain & Ors. Vs Icici Bank Ltd. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~SB-1, 2, 3 & 4

¶2

*	IN THE HIGH COURT O	F DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+	LPA 206/2016
	AMISH JAIN & ORS.	..... Appellants
	Through versus	Mr. Amish Jain, appellant No.1 in person.
	ICICI BANK LTD.	..... Respondent
	Through	Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates.
2
+	LPA 207/2016
	AMISH JAIN & ORS.	..... Appellants
	Through versus	Mr. Amish Jain, appellant No. 1in person.
	ICICI BANK LTD.	..... Respondent
	Through	Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates.
3
+	LPA 208/2016
	AMISH JAIN & ORS.	..... Petitioners
	Through versus	Mr. Amish Jain, appellant No. 1 in person.
	ICICI BANK LTD.	..... Respondent
	Through	Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates.
4
+	LPA 211/2016
	AMISH JAIN & ORS.	..... appellants
	Through	Mr. Amish Jain, appellant No.1 in
	versus	person.
	ICICI BANK LTD.	..... Respondent
	Through	Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates.
LPA	206/2016, 207/2016, 208/2016 & 211/2016	Page 1 of 2

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA

¶5

O R D E R % 02.11.2018

¶6

Review Pet. No. 253/2018 in LPA No. 206/2016 Review Pet. No. 252/2018 & CM No. 26235/2018 in LPA No. 207/2016 Review Pet. No. 251/2018 in LPA No. 208/2016 Review Pet. No. 254/2018 in LPA No. 211/2016

¶7

Having heard Mr. Amish Jain, the review petitioner, who appears in person, it is evident that his solitary submission is that the findings arrived at by this Court by way of its order dated 04.05.2018, are erroneous. That being so, the said order can only be assailed, if at all, by way of an appeal.

¶8

In view of the foregoing, the present application seeking review is untenable in law, as the review petitioner has been unable to show any cogent ground for review of the order dated 04.05.2018.

¶9

The review petitions are accordingly dismissed. The pending application also stands disposed of.

¶10

The review petitioner is, however, at liberty to assail the aforesaid order, if so advised, on the ground of being erroneous.

¶11

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

¶12

A.K. CHAWLA, J

¶13

NOVEMBER 02, 2018/ dn

¶14

Page 2 of 2

¶15

LPA 206/2016, 207/2016, 208/2016 & 211/2016

Amish Jain & Ors. v. Icici Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amish Jain & Ors. v. Icici Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Supriti Bishwas & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Sarita Vs Registrar Cooperative Societie

Shashi Dua Vs Registrar Cooperative Societie

Namita Vs Madan Singh

Amish Jain & Anr. Vs Icici Bank Ltd.

Amish Jain & Anr. Vs Icici Bank Ltd.