Appeal dismissed as the Court declined to interfere with the Single Judge's order upholding the temporary suspension of the appellant from availing hostel facilities, finding adequate opportunity was granted.
Appeal dismissed along with pending applications; suspension remains in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
PRIDHUMAN GAUR ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Choudhary Ali Zi Kabir, Sh. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Sh. Ashish Bhardwaj and Sh. V. Govinda Ramanan, Advocates.
versus
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY
..... Respondent Through : Sh. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anita Sahani and Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R
This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge declining to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution with an order suspending the appellant for a limited duration from availing hostel facility. It is submitted that the procedure to be adopted would be under Ordinance 3 of the applicable rules of the University and that full opportunity would be granted to all the parties.
In these circumstances, the Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed along with the pending applications.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
MARCH 15, 2018/ajk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Single Judge's order upholding the suspension of the appellant from hostel facilities.
Pridhman Gaur
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
