High Court of Delhi allowed an appeal regarding land acquisition compensation enhancement. Delay was condoned with costs, and the appellant is denied interest for the delay period.
Appeal allowed; compensation enhanced; delay condoned with Rs.30,000/- costs; no interest awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advs. for R-1/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 14.08.2018
Page 1 of 2
LA.APP. 370/2014
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
AUGUST 14, 2018 bs..
Page 2 of 2
LA.APP. 370/2014
3 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing appeal should be condoned given the outcome of a related Supreme Court appeal.
Whether the appellant is entitled to enhancement of compensation based on parity with other claimants.
Whether interest is allowable for the period of delay in filing the appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Impulse India P. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶16
Civil Appeal No.2091/2014 titled Impulse India P. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India
BHURE LAL
UNION OF INDIA
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Parties & counsel
