Allowed

Lakhi Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC17 Aug 2018LA.APP./165/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Delhi condoned 1947 days delay in filing an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on the Charan Singh Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was allowed, enhancing compensation with no interest on the delayed period.

What did the court decide?

Compensation awarded by Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 25,00,000/- per acre for Block A land and Rs. 22,00,000/- per acre for Block B land.

Lakhi Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs Vs Union of India & Anr. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LA.APP. 165/2016 & CM No. 22614/2016 (condonation of delay of 1947 days in filing)

¶4

LAKHI RAM (DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for R-2.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

¶9

O R D E R % 17.08.2018

¶10

This appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 impugns the judgment dated 29^th October, 2010 in LAC No. 247/2009 of the Court of Additional District Judge, West on a reference under Section 18 of the Act.

¶11

This appeal was entertained and notice thereof issued on the contention of the counsel for the appellant that the case of the appellant is covered by the judgment dated 11^th December, 2014 of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 10982-11033/2014 titled Charan Singh Vs. Union of India & Anr .

¶12

The appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay of 1947 days in filing thereof.

¶13

LA.APP. 165/2016

¶14

page 1 of 2

¶15

The counsels state that in other appeals with respect to land acquired vide the same Notification and Award, the compensation has been ordered to be enhanced to Rs.25,00,000/- per acre in respect of Block A land and to Rs. 22,00,000/- per acre with respect to Block B land. The counsels further state that there is no dispute in this appeal as to the Block in which the land of the appellants is situated.

¶16

Following the spirit of principle of parity, it is deemed appropriate to condone the delay in preferring the appeal, subject to the appellant paying costs of Rs.25,000/- to the counsel for the respondent No.1 and further subject to the condition that the appellant will not be entitled to interest on the enhancement for the period of delay.

¶17

CM No. 22614/2016 is disposed of.

¶18

The appeal is allowed. The compensation awarded by the Reference Court is enhanced in terms of the judgment aforesaid of the Supreme Court, save that the appellant will not be entitled to interest on the said enhancement for the period of delay.

¶19

The appeal is disposed of.

¶20

Decree sheet be prepared subject to payment of costs within three weeks.

¶21

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J

¶22

AUGUST 17, 2018 SR..

¶23

page 2 of 2

¶24

LA.APP. 165/2016

Lakhi Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakhi Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Mahender Singh Vs Govt. of N. C. T. of Delhi

Pradeep Gambhir & Anr. Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Rakhi Vs Babu Lal and Anr.

Gulshan Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Yogesh Panwar Vs Manisha Pawar

Sachin Bhatia Vs Shweta Gupta