This appeal challenges a Single Judge's order declaring certain prayers infructuous and one without legal cause in a suit regarding club elections. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the challenge to appointment outcomes was futile after subsequent elections and the other prayer was too general.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
% Date of decision: 4th July, 2018
RAVINDRA NATH SAHNI ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Anisha Banerji, Adv.
versus
M/S CHEMSFORD CLUB LTD & ORS. .... Respondents Through : Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sankalp Goswami and Mr. Azhar Alam, Advs. for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
FAO(OS)No.74/2018 Page 1 of 3
FAO(OS)No.74/2018 Page 2 of 3
(a), (c) and (d) is concerned and the challenge to the order passed on prayer (e) is not assailable.
The appeal and the application are therefore dismissed.
No order as to costs.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 04, 2018/ kr
FAO(OS)No.74/2018 Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the single Judge's order declaring certain prayers infructuous and one prayer without legal cause of action in a suit regarding club elections is legally sustainable.
Ravindra Nath Sahni
M/S Chemsford Club Ltd
Gita Mittal
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
