The High Court of Delhi granted leave to the appellant to withdraw its appeal with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings, which were accordingly dismissed and disposed of.
Leave was granted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
R P EXPLORER MASTER FUND ..... Appellant Through: Mr Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr Aman Varma and Ms Anshula Grover and Ms Kruttika, Advs.
versus
GAGAN RASTOGI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ayush Agrawal and Mr Vikrant Singh, Advs for R-1 Mr Dinesh Rastogi and Ms Harshita Agarwal, Advs for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Mr Raj Shekhar Rao, learned counsel appearing behalf of the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, if any.
Leave and liberty granted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
APRIL 05, 2018 bg
R P Explorer Master Fund
Gagan Rastogi
Dinesh Rastogi
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
