The appeal was held abated and rendered infructuous due to the death of a respondent/defendant for whom an order appointing a guardian ad litem had been refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SAMIR BAJPAI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shantanu Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R
It is submitted that the appeal is abated on account of the death of the respondent/defendant no.3, for whom the order appointing a guardian ad litem was refused.
The appeal is accordingly rendered infructuous.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JULY 06, 2018 nn
Shivani Khulla and Anr
Samir Bajpai & ORS
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
