M/S Abb India Ltd. v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28 & 29
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal and Mr. Junaid H. Nahvi, Advs.
M/S ABB INDIA LTD.
versus
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Sweta Singh and Mr. V. Mathur, Advs. for R-1.
M/S ABB INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal and Mr. Junaid H. Nahvi, Advs.
versus
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Sweta Singh and Mr. V. Mathur, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 13.02.2018
Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur, the learned counsel for respondent no.1 appears on service of advance notice, and states that the appeals are not maintainable.
In view of the circumstance that the appellant’s application for interim relief is listed before the learned ADJ on 16.02.2018, the learned counsel for respondent no.1 states upon instructions, that till 16.02.2018 they would not take any precipitate measures pursuant to their letter of invocation dated 05.02.2018 to the bank i.e. respondent no.2.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that for this interim accommodation he would not press the appeals and would like to withdraw them, without prejudice.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.
A copy of this order be given d asti to the parties under the signatures of the Court Master.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 /kk
M/S ABB INDIA LTD.
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court