The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal and a pending application in default due to the non-appearance of the appellants, noting they were not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bhuvneshwar Tyagi, Advocate for Ms.Rashmi Malhotra, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
% 22.11.2018
There is no appearance on behalf of the appellants.
It seems that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal. The appeal along with the pending application, being CM No. 29661/2016, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
VINOD GOEL, J.
NOVEMBER 22, 2018
“shailendra”
RAVI BHUSAN SHRIVASTVA & ANR
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
