The court accepted the respondent-tenant's standalone undertaking not to disturb possession. The suit for permanent injunction was decreed based on this undertaking, directing the tenant to refrain from interference without due process of law.
Suit for permanent injunction decreed; Defendant undertook not to disturb possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S SANDBERRY HOTEL ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Pranita Shekhar, Advocate with Mr.Sunny Bansal, plaintiff
versus
SAROJ DEVI SEHRAWAT ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Yudhishtr Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 06.12.2018
due process of law.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
DECEMBER 06, 2018 ds
M/s Sandberry Hotel
Saroj Devi Sehrawat
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
