A joint registrar noted the absence of plaintiffs despite repeated calls while reviewing the taxed costs memo prepared by the registry. The registered officer's calculation was accepted and the suit costs were taxed.
Costs of the suit were taxed at Rs. 1,25,075.60.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
..... Plaintiff
Through: None.
versus
CITIBANK & ANR
..... Defendant Through: None.
CORAM:
SH. VIJAY SHANKAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
File is taken up on office note
Memo of costs received from the Registry.
None appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs despite repeated calls.
The memo of costs prepared by the Officer on the basis of material available on record, has been checked by concerned Assistant Registrar/Administrative Officer (Judicial). The calculation made by the Office is accepted and cost of the suit are taxed at Rs. 1,25,075.60p (Rs. One Lac Twenty Five Thousand Seventy Five and Sixty Paise only).
VIJAY SHANKAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
MAY 14, 2019 /nk
HARMEEPAL SINGH BINDRA & ORS
CITIBANK & ANR
VIJAY SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
