Court passed a decree based on the terms of a Settlement Agreement and disposed of the suit, entitling the plaintiff to refund of court fees.
Suit disposed of per Settlement Agreement; plaintiff entitled to refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~OS-1
versus CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD AND ORS..... Defendant Through Mr.Manish Kumar Choudhary, Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Ms.Kritika Khurana and Mr.Harshul Singh, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 05.02.2018
Parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide Settlement Agreement dated 22.11.2017 and 20.12.2017. The terms and conditions of the settlement are stated in paragraph 8 of the Settlement Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement are legal and valid. Parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement.
A decree is passed in terms of the Settlement Agreement. Suit stands disposed of in terms thereof. Plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fees in terms of Section 16 of The Court Fees Act, 1870 readwith section 89 CPC.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 n
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
