The Court clarified an earlier order regarding the return of the plaint along with court fees to the plaintiff for filing in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction in three commercial suits.
Clarification issued that plaint along with court fees be returned to the plaintiff for filing in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30, 31, 32
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 19.03.2018
IA Nos. 3793/2018 in CS(COMM) 1082/2016, IA Nos. 3794/2018 in CS(COMM) 1087/2016, IA Nos. 3792/2018 in CS(COMM) 1088/2016, (of the plaintiff for clarification)
CS(COMM) Nos.1082/2016, 1087/2016, 1088/2016
page 1 of 2
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J MARCH 19, 2018 SRwt CS(COMM) Nos.1082/2016, 1087/2016, 1088/2016 page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to clarify the order of return of plaint for filing in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction.
HSIL LIMITED
IMPERIAL CERAMIC AND ANR
GUJRAT CERAMIC INDUSTRIES
MAX CERAMIC INDUSTRIES AND ANR
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
