4,000/- p.m. only. The trial court noted various discrepancies and inconsistencies in the documents placed on record. Admittedly, the brothers, mother and sister of the petitioner all have settled abroad; he himself had travelled abroad several times as reflected in the photocopy of the pass-port placed on record. The petitioner claims that House No.E-5/22, Sector-16, Rohini was purchased by him and sufficient amount was incurred for its construction. He, however, did not divulge as to from where the money was arranged for purchase and construction. The trial court has noted various ‘admissions’ made by the petitioner in civil proceedings whereby he had claimed himself to be belonging to a family having a very high status; he claimed to have a lot of income. He received a payment of 50,686/- from his brother Amodh Kumar Sharma from abroad. The impugned order records that the petitioner was having FDRs, NSCs, IPVs, KVPs, Post office scheme, PPF etc. and interest income therefrom. Various documents showing bank transactions carried out by the petitioner have been filed. It was further observed that the bank passbook and other records show that the petitioner was dealing in shares, debentures etc.; he had shares in Inderprastha Gas Limited; two demat accounts. From all these admissions/documents, it can be inferred that the petitioner has sufficient regular income not only to maintain himself but also the child.
