Disposed
Sammi Sound Tech Pvt.Ltd. v. Sh. Paik Sung Gull & Ors.
Delhi HCCRL.O.(CO.)/12/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~CP-33
SAMMI SOUND TECH PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL.
versus
SH. PAIK SUNG GULL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
%
20.03.2018
This complaint under Section 454 (5) and (5A) of the Companies Act is filed against the respondents. Learned counsel for the OL points out that as far as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, they are not Indian citizens and appear to have returned back to Korea. As far as respondent No. 3 is concerned, he is untraceable.
It would be a futile exercise to continue the present proceedings. Petition stands disposed of.
In case any information is received about the whereabouts of the respondents, liberty is granted to the OL to revive the present petition.
JAYANT NATH, J
MARCH 20, 2018 rb
SAMMI SOUND TECH PVT.LTD.
SH. PAIK SUNG GULL
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court