Allowed
Sharad Kumar @ Monty v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/987/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
SHARAD KUMAR @ MONTY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Siddharth Yadav, Adv.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, APP for State SI Narendra Kumar, PS R.K. Puram.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 15.05.2018
W.P.(CRL) 987/2018
1 of 2
S.P.GARG, J.
MAY 15, 2018 neelam
2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 987/2018
Item No.32
CRL.REV.P. 474/2014
Date: 15.05.2018.
Statement of Chitra, W/o Rajender @ Raju R/o H.No.608/1 Gali No.9, Krishna Gali Maujpur, Delhi (respondent No.2 in person)
I received an amount of Rs.3,500/- cash in the Court today from the petitioner towards interim maintenance.
RO&AC May 15, 2018
S.P.GARG, J.
Sharad Kumar @ Monty
State
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court