This Court granted two months parole to a petitioner convicted under the NDPS Act for medical treatment including angiography and angioplasty, requiring him to furnish a personal bond and one surety.
Two months parole granted on furnishing a personal bond of `30,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KOTHARI JAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Ms.Neha Kapoor, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC. SI Harkesh Meena, PS Tilak Marg.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 01.05.2018
Page 1 of 2
S.P.GARG, J
MAY 01, 2018 / tr
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a non-bailable offender convicted under the NDPS Act, is entitled to relief of parole for medical treatment?
Whether the petitioner has been correctly advised medical treatment requiring parole?
Whether the petitioner’s previous parole history indicates misuse of bail?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
ANIL KOTHARI JAIN
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
S P GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
