Farida Khatoon v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal Leopoldo petition and delay application for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear and no steps for serving the respondent were taken.
What did the court decide?
Petition and application dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
18# $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.L.P. 91/2017 and Crl. M.A. No. 2626/2017 (Delay) FARIDA KHATOON ..... Petitioner Represented by: None.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Rajiv Kumar, PS Jaitpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 12.09.2018
Despite pass-over none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
No steps have been taken for service of respondent No.2.
Petition and application are dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 ‘vn’
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
FARIDA KHATOON
- respondent
STATE
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court