Mohd Akram v. Devi Dayal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a criminal miscellaneous case by default due to absence of the petitioner despite repeated calls and availability of pending application during the post-lunch session.
What did the court decide?
Petition and pending application dismissed in default.
What the court decided
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 91/2016 & CRL.M.A. 370/2016 MOHD AKRAM ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus DEVI DAYAL ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 27.07.2018
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the matter being called out repeatedly, even though it was passed over awaiting appearance in the post-lunch session. It is 3:50 p.m. The position remains the same.
The petition and the pending application are dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 27, 2018 nk
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHD AKRAM
- respondent
DEVI DAYAL
Coram
R.K.GAUBA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court