Petitioner's petition for release of bank guarantee money was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take further remedies if desired.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take available legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ajay, SI Pritosh, SI Ashok, PS Kirti Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 02.05.2018
By this petition, the petitioner seeks release of the sum of ₹9,56,75,000/- deposited by the petitioner and other accused as bank guarantee pursuant to the order dated 5th March, 2015 passed by this Court in Bail Application Nos. 2674/2014, 2680/2014, 38/2015, 119/2015 and 123/2015 while granting bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take remedies as available in law at appropriate stage.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 02, 2018 ‘yo’
Madan Lal Chowatia
State (NCT of Delhi)
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
