This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
URMILA SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STAE (N.C.T OF DELHI)& ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Siddharth Sindu, Advocate with SI Ashwani , PS Jyoti Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 06.03.2018
Crl.M.A. No. 4192/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 693/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition as on the complaint of the petitioner FIR has already been registered.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 06, 2018 ‘yo’
Urmila Sharma
STAE (N.C.T OF Delhi) & ANR
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
