The High Court of Delhi dismissed the withdrawal of the appeal and pending applications as well as the appeal itself. The appellant reserved contentions for trial court proceedings.
Appeal and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
ROOPDARSHAN PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Jaiswal, Advocate
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State with SI Kishanveer Bhati, PS Shakarpur
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
% 02.07.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the appellant submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal and the pending applications as the petitioner reserves all his contentions and defences to be agitated in the further proceedings arising out of the impugned order before the trial court.
The appeal and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 02, 2018 yg
Roopdarshan Pandey
State
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
