The petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition reserving right to raise contentions at the trial stage. The court granted the petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State ACP Rajender Singh & SI Sandeep Malik
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 06.07.2018
Counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition as the petitioners reserve right to raise their contentions to be adjudicated at the stage of consideration of charge before the trial court. It is hoped and expected that given the necessary cooperation of both sides, the trial judge shall adjudicate on the question of charge at an early date.
The petition along with accompanying application is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JULY 06, 2018 ns
Seema Bhardwaj & Anr
State & Anr
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
