Disposed
Bharat Bhushan v. Sta Te
Delhi HCCRL.A./593/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-36 & 37
| * | IN THE HIGH COU | RT OF DE | LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| + | BHARAT BHUSHAN | CRL.A. 59 Through: |
3/2003 ..... Appellant None. |
| versus | |||
| STATE | Through: | ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. |
|
| + | CHANDERWATI | CRL.A. 59 Through: |
7/2003 ..... Appellant None. |
| versus | |||
| STATE | Through: | ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. |
|
| CORAM: JUSTICE JUSTICE % |
S. MURALI VINOD GO O R D E 13.09.201 |
DHAR EL R 8 |
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2018/ “shailendra”
Bharat Bhushan
Chanderwati
State
S. Muralidhar
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court