The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal petition and application. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, binding the petitioner to the submitted undertaking to appear in the trial court.
Petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ 52
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Mohd. Amanuallah with Mr. Misbah Bin Tariq & Mr. Anas Zadi, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
% 16.07.2018
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition and the accompanying application submitting an undertaking that the petitioner will present himself before the trial court and scrupulously appear on each and every date of hearing in the complaint case hereafter.
The petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn binding the petitioner with the undertaking given.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JULY 16, 2018 srb
Vivek Arora
The State, Govt of NCT of Delhi
R.K.GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
