High Court Delhi allowed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR Sections for 406/498A/34 IPC. Case settled amicably post-divorce; court observed no useful purpose would be served in continuing proceedings.
FIR No.106/2011 and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
RAKESH KAROTIYA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.S.Oberoi, APP. Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Advocate with Mohd.Akhtar, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. SI Amit Mann, PS Defence Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R % 02.01.2018
CRL.M.A.No.21507/2017 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 5541/2017
Page 1 of 2
S.P.GARG, J.
JANUARY 02, 2018 / tr
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Whether continuation of proceedings serves any useful purpose given the resolution of disputes.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Karotiya & Ors.
The State & Anr.
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
