Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
YASHPAL & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. C.M. Sangwan and Mr. Sandeep Rohan, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC alongwith Ms. Amrit and Ms. Sushila, Advocates with ASI Dharam Singh, PS-Sultanpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R
% 04.07.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioners had sought pass over to obtain instructions. He says he has been instructed and would like to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JULY 04, 2018 RW
Yashpal & Anr
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
