Appeal dismissed; court observed petitioner is father of Salim Shah, not Shehnaz Shah; ordered police to facilitate visit between parents and daughter if she consents.
(police) facilitate meeting between parents of Shehnaz Shah and her if she is willing
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Tushar Sannu and Mr.Prashant Singh, Advocates for State. Insp. Rakesh Kumar and ASI Parmanand, P.S. Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 12.02.2018
that they have no objection to her marriage. Their counsel conveyed their desire to meet Shehnaz once in the Court premises. However, Shehnaz Shah is not willing to do so at present.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 ‘dc’
SALIM SHAH
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
S. MURALIDHAR
I. S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
